哈姆雷特英語讀后感（一）

　　"Hamlet" about to complete in 1601. It is above all a plot of revenge tragedy of ups and downs, the most fascinating is that Hamlet's "hesitation": his revenge delay action until the last minute plot development. Dramatic beginning, there ghost of the kings of the things Claudius murdered Hamlet informed, ready to go on a revenge. However, Hamlet worried that this is "the devil" mischief, or the death of his father because of his depression caused by the sky, so the words do not believe in ghosts, but rather trying to view Claudius of a "play within the play" a reflection of themselves to determine whether he is the culprit. He could at confession by Claudius when he was killed, but out of religious considerations and do not want to start at this time, the other into heaven. Until he and Leietisi fencing, his mother mistakenly drank the original Claudius poisoned wine prepared for him to die, he was struggling to Pichu sword of vengeance, and he eventually fell in bloody revenge.

哈姆雷特英語讀后感（二）

　　“To be, or not to be, that is the question”。 But after answering this question, what comes next?  To be in what kind of ways may bring you the value of life? And is the value precious enough for you to continue living? These are questions that can never be solved. Hamlet chose to live, in order to revenge the tragic death of his honest father, the Danish king. On account of Hamlet was so kind, he missed the best chance of killing his uncle, the murderer of his father. The uncle, who was the new king, devised several plans to kill Hamlet, indirectly killed Hamlet’s beloved Ophelia、Ophelia’s brother and father, and Hamlet’s mother, the new queen who was married to his uncle. These tragedies finally forced Hamlet to make his decision, and stabbed the sword of revenge to his uncle. Unfortunately, Hamlet was already hurt by a sword with poison on it and would be dead quickly at the moment. It was the kindness and hesitation made him fail. For his father, died while having a grasping dream and went to hell for that. Hamlet didn’t kill his uncle while he was praying because if he killed him at that time, he would have gone to heaven. Hamlet didn’t want to return good for evil, this irresolute nature caused the failure of his revenge. But why would god send a person to heaven or hell only considering what he’s thinking about at the last moment of life? Is that really fair? There is no doubt that Hamlet lived in a period of time that everybody was “crazy” and everybody except Hamlet was unaware of the truth. Hamlet even had to fake madness to prevent others from having suspicion. So why  being sober when everybody else is drunk? Why being normal when everybody else is mad? It’s to keep your soul clear from being stained, it’s to stop cheating yourself when the truth is already out. It’s worthwhile to die for bringing out the truth, cause living with the concealed truth is worse than dying, especially when the truth that everyone should see is buried with your own hands. “To die - to sleep! But in that sleep of death what dreams may come”， who knows? The heaven loss of life in the play brought us shock, and in a short while, kept us from making the same mistake. But even this does not last too long. Time flies, but even flying time can not stop us from making the tragedy happens again and again. Instead, time took the sadness and regret away, weakened the memory. No more left but the sad touching story and the melody from fair Ophelia when she drowned in running stream. It’s not just a play, it’s something that is happening on the earth every moment. People never learn, soon the laughter and cheers may replace the lamentation, like the newborn roses covered the dead branches in spring. It’s the law of nature, living people continue living, death brings several days of weeping, but what remains? Nothing but dust and soil. This happened before, it’s happening now, but in the future （we hope） this shall never happen again.

哈姆雷特英語讀后感（三）

　　Were one to have the profound hatred, were one to avenge and harm his family who seems too far to harm, he would be either a hero or a monster. Should he fight the unbeatable foe and right the wrong, should he bear with unbearable sorrow, should he ruin himself in twisted enthusiasm, he would be Hamlet.

　　Among all the masterpieces of William Shakespeare, “Hamlet”， undoubtedly is worshipped and as one of the most successful and admired tragedies, while the character Hamlet remains one of the most loved dramatis personas in all-time history of literature.

　　To have read Shakespeare's “Romeo and Juliet” by the age of 16, I was moved to tears, while having no empathy with his another great one “Tempest”。 Presumably when I get 60 or older, I could be wise enough to understand the latter, but find it nothing worthwhile to go over the former one, where lays a romantic story that the only youngsters are addicted to. But it's a fact that whenever in our lifetime after gaining such experiences as getting through hard times, or, finding a real self, from “Hamlet”， we always find something that we consider as perpetuation, which is worth deep thoughts. This is because it highlights Hamlet's choices of life, choices made under certain circumstances of history and society, requested by the fate extraordinary to Hamlet himself, but ordinary to mankind. That is, to some extent, his experiences make a similar one to ours and, his destiny is something we're facing sometime in our own lives.

　　We're possibly the same. We explore the truth in the dark. We discover facts from the mist. We lose ourselves in determinations. We trespass on which we're forbid to be, hesitates at love and hatred, and struggle to rebuild system of values and spiritual prop in a world without standards and scales of standards.liuxue86.com

　　Hamlet couldn't have been perfect. He is very much a person motivated by irrational enthusiasm, impetuous enough to kill Polonius only to find it's a mistake as the victim is not the king. But somehow it is for his poor enthusiasm, his weakness of humanity, that Hamlet touches countless readers, as everyone makes out himself from the ill-fated prince.

　　Hamlet's “revenge” isn't so much simply the killing of Claudius, as it is the purging of all the rottenness in the Danish court. And although it costs him his life, he succeeds.

　　At some time, we all consider how much wrong there is in the world. “Hamlet” gives us a chance to watch an ordinary person consciously choose to say “No!” to the world's wrongness and falsities, and to strike back with power. William Shakespeare held up the mirror to something in us that is precious.

　　I hear Hamlet thinking, “Too many people waste too much effort doing things that are not worthwhile. It's a bad world, and I am far from a perfect human being. We all end up dead in the end. So I am going to do something worthwhile, and do it right.”(www.lotusphilosophies.com)

　　I hear him wondering, “What is a man, If his chief good and market of his time. Is but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more.”

　　I hear him whispering “To be, or not to be, aye, there's the point. To die, to sleep, is that all? Aye, all.”

　　That makes a hero to me, regardless of his blindness and madness which haunt everyone for a while in his time. Thousands of readers may have thousands of their own Hamlet, but there's something that stays the same, that Hamlet dares to run, where the brave dare not go. That's his quest.

　　Thinks about it.