本文為幸福來(lái)敲門(mén)電影觀后感英語(yǔ)范文，讓我們通過(guò)以下的文章來(lái)了解。

范文一

All civilized men believe that one of the rights of man is to pursue happiness.Lewis,however,argues that we have “no right to pursue happiness at the expense of honesty,loyalty or common humanity.

There is an movie which can express my opinion about the pursuit of happiness.

This film is about a poor father called Christ Gardner.He met his father at 26.He wanted to change the situation of the family.He bought 50 bone scanners ,he wanted to sale these by 240 dollars to make a change.But he failed.Most of the doctors think it as a useless and expensive machine .Because of that ,Christ had to find out other ways to make it. With the help of a magic cube ,he succeeded getting a chance to practice in Dean Witter,he want to be a stockbroker,because he meet a person who own a wonderful car,he ask him how to make it ,and he got the answer that he was a stockbroker.But there are 20 person attending this practice.But at last ,only one person will be hired.And to make matters worse,during the 6 months of the practice,there are no salary.This is the difficult time for Christ and his son ,for his wife left him and went to New York,and the money they selled the scanners was taken by government because they didn’t pay the tax,of course they did not go any warn before.During that time ,they cannot live in the flat where the keeper is always asking them for the money.Every day ,he had to be hurried to catch the bus to Glade,a church where they could live without paying money.In order to get there on time ,the favourite toy his son owned couldn’t be pick up from the ground when the bus came.And one day ,they failed to catch the bus ,they even lived in a toilet.When some one want to get in ,Christ locked the door.And at that time ,he cried.After the most difficult time ,the spring for him is coming.He was hired.He was so exciting that he cannot hold his notebook.He went to he street ,said:this part ,this little part ,is called happiness.Compared with the word he said at the beginning ,he wondered, They all looked “happy,” “Why not me?.At last ,he succeeded by his hard working.

From this story ,we know that in order to succeed ,we have to spend something that others cannot spent,stand something that others cannot stand ,then you can receive something that others cannot receive .No pains ,no gains .If only we can work hard like him ,we will also succeed.So we shouldn’t have the thought that someone can succeed without any paying.Everyone of us has to try our by to pursuit the happiness of ours.

范文二

I don’t know for sure whether it is the cold or the movie that kept me tossing and turning in bed， but one thing is certain: many scattered fragments of the movie again and again flashed in my mind. My cell phone read 4:16 am at that time， but I was not sleepy at all. So I decided to get up and write something.

"The Pursuit of Happyness" -- the title comes from a misspelled schoolhouse mural -- has a lot on its mind but mostly this: If America is about the promise of bettering oneself， why does it have to be so freaking hard? In the movie， Jefferson's Declaration of Independence words about happiness kept recurring to Chris Gardner. Every day， Christ had to work hard from morning till night， but still could hardly make a living. Chris saw a bunch of suits， mostly male， pouring out of the Dean Witter Reynolds brokerage firm in downtown San Francisco. They all looked “happy，” “Why not me? “ Christ wondered. He did have an adorable boy， Christopher， but wife Linda was becoming a scarecrow of overworked anxiety. Finally， his wife left Christ because of life pressure， leaving him and her five-year-old son， Christopher. And naturally， Christ became a single father.

With the failure of his business， Christ had no money to pay for the rent， so they were driven away from the flat. They became homeless. They slept in asylum， subway station public bathroom or anywhere as a temporary shelter. The destitution of life was absolutely depressing， but for his son’s future， for his own belief， Christ never gave up and he still strongly believed that happiness would come one day if he worked hard enough today.

With his great efforts， Christ won a six-month internship at Dean Witter， but there was no pay at all. So on one hand， Christ had to work hard to make a living; on the other hand， he had to fight for his intern work， since only one of the twenty interns would succeed finally. Besides， he had to take good care of his son after day care. However， Christ made it with his amazing willpower.

Christ was unfortunate， for he got a wife who was not understandable at all (though she has her own difficulties) and was in bad luck with his business. But he was very fortunate also， for he got a son who was very thoughtful and， I think， tough life experiences always make a great person.

It is said that this movie is inspired by a true story， and I want to say， this movie does inspire me a lot. What impressed me most are: Christ’s wife left him because of life pressure; Christ’s love to his son and Christ’s strong belief towards life. Through these， I know that it is not easy to be a good husband and a good Papa， since in reality， only love cannot only make everything. And I also learn that one has to strongly believe in himself， no matter how difficult the situation is， but of course， hard-working is indispensable.

范文三

Chris Gardner is a loving father and failing businessman. He is chosen for a competitive internship at Dean Witter, a stock brokerage. The internship, which offers Chris a very long shot at a better life, doesn't pay any salary. Chris has to live without a salary for six months while risking just about everything for that long shot gamble.

Chris is really smart. He can solve a Rubrik's cube in minutes. But, he's poor. Poverty, like an octopus, keeps trying to suck him down to the bottom, and make him stay there.

His car is towed. His wife walks out on him, leaving him with a five year old son. He is arrested for unpaid traffic tickets. He becomes homeless. He has to rely on a homeless shelter.

All this while, he must appear for work in the morning in a suit and tie, and be ready to charm some of the wealthiest and most powerful people in the Bay Area. These people take wealth so much for granted that two of them stiff him for cab fare.

Having lived through similar experiences, I cringed throughout this movie. My stomach hurt. I winced.(www.lotusphilosophies.com) I cried. I hugged my knees to my chest.

The movie is very accurate, but painful to watch. I hope a lot of rich people, who think that they understand poverty, see it.

This movie will be politically controversial. First of all, it doesn't touch the race issue with a ten foot pole. For example, when Chris appears to stiff a taxi driver for fare (it was really the rich white guy who failed to pay)， the taxi driver never uses the “n” word. In real life, I think he probably would have.

Is the movie afraid to talk about race, or does it not want to? I don't know, but I know that some will protest the movie's not shoving race in the movie goer's face. I'm not one of those people. The movie's approach to race -- treating it as almost incidental -- worked for me. As a poor white person, I can tell you that poor white people face the same obstacles Chris did.

Second, does the movie sell the message that if you work hard, you will succeed, no matter what, and does that message tell the truth about success in America? I think that the movie is open to interpretation. Some will see it as an indictment of poverty in America. The scene of carefree rich people driving past the line to get into a homeless shelter is pretty devastating. Other people will become angry because they believe that the movie's depiction of hard work leading to rewards, in some cases, is too facile. I disagree, but that's what you'll hear.

Third, is this movie meant to chastise black men who abandon their children? Chris is a role model exactly because he moves heaven and earth to be a good father to his son. This will be debated back and forth.

The movie has a big philosophical statement to make, that has been lost on many reviewers, for example, Richard Schickel in TIME.

[幸福來(lái)敲門(mén)電影觀后感英語(yǔ)]