Objectively speaking

Objectively speaking1

　　People in this world can be divided into two categories: people who always work and people who always comment. Office workers never have time to hang out. Some may run hotels or do business; some may open factories or schools; others may focus on scientific research or specialize in military affairs or political issues. Right and wrong, success or failure, they are always fully committed to their profession. Faced with various risks (not because they ignored them, but because they had the courage) and shouldered the responsibility, they moved forward bravely and cautiously. They risk their luck and their lives. They have neither time nor energy to comment on others. While devoting themselves to planning the future, they devoted themselves to hard work so that the story of embroidery and malicious gossips flew into the air. However, people with comments usually work less, and even if they sometimes want to work, they are simply not capable enough. They are no better than anyone, but they also admire anyone. They either blame heaven, or blame the earth, but not themselves. They dare not take risks, but they are also afraid of any hard work. They are gossip sellers, making stories and spreading rumors that upset and frustrate you. It's not because you hurt them, bothered them or hindered them, but because you are working. If only you are working, he will comment here. Everything was tough at the beginning. You have just started a new business and need encouragement and support, but he poured a can of cold water or a cool breeze there, which made you worry or confused. But once you succeed, he will share your success here again without shame for the frustration he gives you.

　　Many people do not like to use their own ideas, but rather to respond to the opinions of others. They often think that those who work are wrong, and those who comment are absolutely right. But, to be fair, how is this possible? Not working itself is already wrong, and it is a mistake to hurt hardworking people.

　　From ancient times to the present, many great men have been under constant review. Take Confucius, Emperor Qin, Empress Wu Ze, and Dr. Genghis Khan. Sun Shangshun, Chairman Mao and Deng Xiaoping. They have been criticized both positively and negatively. Not only have they been praised, but they have also been slandered from all over the world. When reviewing what is right and what is wrong, the reviewer does not really know what is wrong and what is right. They just demand perfection. When criticizing others for their incompetence, they are actually powerless, just pretending to know more. This can be compared with actors and spectators. New shows are always accompanied by a lot of criticism from the audience. But if the audience has a chance to perform, disaster will certainly happen. Diners are always commenting on the skills of chefs, and readers are always criticizing writers. Another suitable example is the forty-episode sequel to Dreaming of the Red Mansion, which was written by Gao and his performance is almost perfect. However, there are always people who claim to be experts in this novel, criticizing the last forty chapters as a tragic sequel to a fine work. What if we ask them to write a sequel? I'm afraid they will only make the situation worse. easy to say, hard to do.

Objectively speaking2

　　Many people don't like using their mind but enjoy echoing the views of others. They often take it for granted that the working ones are wrong while the commenting ones are definitely right. However in all fairness, how can it be true? Not working itself is already wrong, and it is a blunder to hurt the hard working people.

　　From ancient time to the present, many great men have been commented on endlessly. Take the cases of Confucius, Emperor Qinshihuang, Empress Wu Zetian, Gengis Khan, Dr. Sun Yet-sun, Chairman Mao, Deng Xiaoping, etc.. Both positive and negative criticism have been made about them. They not only enjoyed compliments but also suffered slanders from all over the world.

　　When commenting on what's right and what's wrong, the commenting ones themselves don't really know what is wrong and what is right. They are simply demanding perfection. When criticizing the others' inability, they themselves are actually unable to do anything, but simply pretending that they know better. This can well be compared with the actors and spectators. A new program is always followed by large amounts of criticism from the spectators. But if a spectator is given a chance to perform, a disaster will surely happen. Diners are always commenting on the skills of the chefs while readers are always criticizing the writers. Another case in point is the forty-chapter sequel of A Dream of the Red Mansions , which were written by Gao E who did a nearly perfect job. Nevertheless there are always such people who claim to be the experts on the novel, criticizing the latter forty chapters as a wretched sequel to a fine work. What if we ask them to write the sequel? I'm afraid they can only make it worse. It's easier said than done.

　　Capable and wealthy people are always the focus of the society.

　　Capable people are usually marching ahead of others and may not be properly understood, hence causing various kinds of comments, more criticism but less support;

　　Capable people can easily succeed, thus causing both admiration and comments, more jealousy but less appreciation ;

　　Capable people can be sought for help and attract the attention of the society, thus causing a lot of comments, more complaints but less gratitude ;

　　Capable people can also suffer setbacks , experiencing fully the warmth and coldness of the human world, more hurts but less helps.